Sunday
Nov142010
Mobilization Musings: Moving to the Unreached
I am not sure how to construct this post in a way that is not going to offend some. It’s not that I am afraid of offending people. I’m not so bad at that. However, I really don’t like being offensive. I particularly don’t like the possibility of offending people whom I know and even like. (This may be why I really don’t have that many friends…)
But I write.
The past few months have found me in different kinds of churches, mostly in Wisconsin, to talk missions, Mongolia and the Kingdom and Glory of Christ. Each church is a menagerie of different experiences: fun, interesting and, in some cases … well … interesting. I've been in small churches and I've been in large churches, each with its own dynamic and various strengths and weaknesses. I must say that over all it's been a good experience, even though I am now quite ready to get back to my family in Franklin.
Missions mobilization is the primary job of the furloughing missionary. I believe that. My aim is that as many churches as possible will be involved with God's mission for the world. It’s my hope that stories from the field, direct contact with the workers (i.e., me) and exposition of the Bible will help people in churches move closer to the least reached and unreached peoples of the world.
I make one major observation from doing this tour (this is where the offensive part comes). The key individual for missions mobilization and missions engagement in local churches in America is not the visiting missionary. It is not the missions committee chair. It is not the common member of the congregation. The key missions mobilizer in any church is the pastor and/or the pastoral leadership. In every church I have visited the heat of missions fervor is relative to the lead pastor's interest (or disinterest) in the overseas work. It's the maxim. The constant. The every-time reality.
I’ll be careful here. I was a pastor for a long time. I understand the pressures that are on the shepherd of a congregation. It can be overwhelming ... and it can be overwhelming to even think about one more thing to be responsible for. Particularly something that may seem minor. Missions involvement. Isn’t that why we have missionaries? Isn't discipleship more critical? What about local evangelism? Why missions? Why one more thing? I understand the pressure from below and the pressure from above that pastors face. I really do. But, sorry pastor dude (if it's possible there is a pastor among the four or five who read this blog). I can't let up on this issue. The missions temperature of any given church depends on where the pastor sets the thermostat. It’s been true in every church I’ve visited.
So what's a leader in the church to do? I am going to list four things that I think will help. There’s much more there, perhaps. But, here is my initial stab at a list that I hope will be helpful. I am open to more. I like discussion. As you can see, I have absolutely no opinions about this issue, at all (tongue firmly planted in cheek).
1.Bathe in the Bible (... and encourage your people to bathe in the Bible)
The scope of this article does not include an argument of why missions should be a center piece to every Christian church. Suffice it to say that there is plenty of material out there to make this argument. I have read the Bible from cover to cover several times during my years of ministry, and I find the issue of God's glory being revealed and spread to all peoples of the earth a consistent in Scripture. It's in every book of the Bible. All I can say is read it. You'll discover this to be Scripture’s central theme. Any person (or pastor) who lives in and is fed by the Scriptures will find a Biblical motivation for caring about unreached and unengaged peoples around the globe. I really believe that we should care about what the Bible cares about. In doing that we care about what Jesus cares about and our priorities are right. Too often, Pastor (yeah, I’ll speak directly here) we get too concerned about our own ministry kingdom and personal ego. I say this from experience. I've been there. I know the human ego - and worse, the pastoral ego - far too well. This is why God gave us the gift of the cross. We must crucify fleshly ego that gets in the way of what He really wants to do through His church, purchased with His blood, that we have been called to lead. We can only lead when dead to self. There’s no other way.
2. Understand Missiology (... and do what it takes to help your people understand missiology)
This may seem like an ivory tower issue. I know that the popular way to advertise churches now days is to let people know that we give "practical messages" and most would not find missiology immediately practical. The problem here goes back to number 1, at least to some extent. A people mobilized for missions are a people who are versed in the Scriptures. However, it is also important to understand the unique issues surrounding overseas work. I have met with missions committees who have no idea about basic issues like contextualization, dependency or church planting. While these things may not seem to have immediate relevance, the person who is mobilized to do their part in fulfilling the Great Commission should at least be aware of some of the issues that those on the field are facing. One the best educational resources for missions mobilization that I am aware of is the material put out by the US Center for World Missions called "Perspectives". As far as I am concerned, this is something every pastor should take. If possible, every member of the missions committee should be scholarshiped by the church to go through this. This training of local pastors and missions leaders will serve those of us who are serving on the field beyond telling, in terms of awareness, help and support. It will make a missions committee more effective in doing it's job and it will give the local church greater global impact.
3. Don't Make Everything "Missions" (because that will make nothing missions)
I know the trends. I know we now use the term "mission" as a generic word for "outreach.” Some churches will use "global" and "local" as descriptive modifiers. However, it seems many churches are confused when it comes to the difference between these two areas. And there is a difference. It is not appropriate to pit local outreach and global missions against each other, or to call one more important than the other. However, I also think we do a disservice to both areas when we equate them with each other. Reaching out to American inner cities or helping hurricane victims on the Gulf coast is good work that churches should be involved with. However, this is not the same thing as connecting with those who are crossing culture to reach an unreached, under-reached or unengaged people group. Churches in America can and should be involved with both. Our terminology is important and people get confused when we equate local outreach to global engagement. These are not the same things. While it may be possible to be engaged globally and not involved locally, this is not a typical problem. In most of my observations the exact opposite issue is a greater problem. More churches than ever are engaged at a local level, and assume that things will care for themselves globally. There’s an incredible disconnect. This is exacerbated when we call local outreach "missions" and pat each other on the back for being "missions-minded", when in reality the church is mostly about locally growing bigger and gives very little thought to the unreached and unengaged peoples of the world. Global missions and local outreach are not the same, and engagement with one does not mean engagement with the other.
4. Get Involved With Relationally Based Strategic Partnerships
This means that your church connects directly with a field, a worker or a field project at a personal and relational level. In other words, the local church actually knows and understands international workers, and their work. Partnership is relationship that moves to a specific way of the local church praying for, resourcing, connecting and communicating with the field. Church members know the overseas work and is able to participate with that work in incredibly tangible ways. The field worker, likewise, knows the church and has connected with the people there. We have partner churches who have paid for and installed computer labs, taught Mongolian girls how to quilt and provided field workers with needed vehicles. Official strategic partnerships connect the church with the field, and the field with the church. I'm a fan. For churches in my denomination, this is can now be accomplished in an official manner at www.cmalliance.org. I can’t tell you how much I am a fan of this model of mobilization. It engages both the church and the field and is a true “win/win” for all involved. (Contact me personally if you want more specifics!)
In the end, missions mobilization requires intentional pastoral involvement and there’s no way around it. Pastor (here I go talking direct again), you have to be globally engaged. Meet with and encourage the missions committee. Take “Perspectives” with them. Partner with a field or a field worker. Bathe and believe in the Bible. It's not enough to talk about local outreach, or even to make random short term trips. Make sure your theology of missions includes the unreached, under-reached and unengaged peoples of the world.
Missions should be in the DNA of the church, but it probably won't be until it's the heart of the pastor.
What other ways can a pastor get more involved with missions? How does your church leadership work to mobilize the people of the church for the Great Commission?
But I write.
The past few months have found me in different kinds of churches, mostly in Wisconsin, to talk missions, Mongolia and the Kingdom and Glory of Christ. Each church is a menagerie of different experiences: fun, interesting and, in some cases … well … interesting. I've been in small churches and I've been in large churches, each with its own dynamic and various strengths and weaknesses. I must say that over all it's been a good experience, even though I am now quite ready to get back to my family in Franklin.
Missions mobilization is the primary job of the furloughing missionary. I believe that. My aim is that as many churches as possible will be involved with God's mission for the world. It’s my hope that stories from the field, direct contact with the workers (i.e., me) and exposition of the Bible will help people in churches move closer to the least reached and unreached peoples of the world.
I make one major observation from doing this tour (this is where the offensive part comes). The key individual for missions mobilization and missions engagement in local churches in America is not the visiting missionary. It is not the missions committee chair. It is not the common member of the congregation. The key missions mobilizer in any church is the pastor and/or the pastoral leadership. In every church I have visited the heat of missions fervor is relative to the lead pastor's interest (or disinterest) in the overseas work. It's the maxim. The constant. The every-time reality.
I’ll be careful here. I was a pastor for a long time. I understand the pressures that are on the shepherd of a congregation. It can be overwhelming ... and it can be overwhelming to even think about one more thing to be responsible for. Particularly something that may seem minor. Missions involvement. Isn’t that why we have missionaries? Isn't discipleship more critical? What about local evangelism? Why missions? Why one more thing? I understand the pressure from below and the pressure from above that pastors face. I really do. But, sorry pastor dude (if it's possible there is a pastor among the four or five who read this blog). I can't let up on this issue. The missions temperature of any given church depends on where the pastor sets the thermostat. It’s been true in every church I’ve visited.
So what's a leader in the church to do? I am going to list four things that I think will help. There’s much more there, perhaps. But, here is my initial stab at a list that I hope will be helpful. I am open to more. I like discussion. As you can see, I have absolutely no opinions about this issue, at all (tongue firmly planted in cheek).
1.Bathe in the Bible (... and encourage your people to bathe in the Bible)
The scope of this article does not include an argument of why missions should be a center piece to every Christian church. Suffice it to say that there is plenty of material out there to make this argument. I have read the Bible from cover to cover several times during my years of ministry, and I find the issue of God's glory being revealed and spread to all peoples of the earth a consistent in Scripture. It's in every book of the Bible. All I can say is read it. You'll discover this to be Scripture’s central theme. Any person (or pastor) who lives in and is fed by the Scriptures will find a Biblical motivation for caring about unreached and unengaged peoples around the globe. I really believe that we should care about what the Bible cares about. In doing that we care about what Jesus cares about and our priorities are right. Too often, Pastor (yeah, I’ll speak directly here) we get too concerned about our own ministry kingdom and personal ego. I say this from experience. I've been there. I know the human ego - and worse, the pastoral ego - far too well. This is why God gave us the gift of the cross. We must crucify fleshly ego that gets in the way of what He really wants to do through His church, purchased with His blood, that we have been called to lead. We can only lead when dead to self. There’s no other way.
2. Understand Missiology (... and do what it takes to help your people understand missiology)
This may seem like an ivory tower issue. I know that the popular way to advertise churches now days is to let people know that we give "practical messages" and most would not find missiology immediately practical. The problem here goes back to number 1, at least to some extent. A people mobilized for missions are a people who are versed in the Scriptures. However, it is also important to understand the unique issues surrounding overseas work. I have met with missions committees who have no idea about basic issues like contextualization, dependency or church planting. While these things may not seem to have immediate relevance, the person who is mobilized to do their part in fulfilling the Great Commission should at least be aware of some of the issues that those on the field are facing. One the best educational resources for missions mobilization that I am aware of is the material put out by the US Center for World Missions called "Perspectives". As far as I am concerned, this is something every pastor should take. If possible, every member of the missions committee should be scholarshiped by the church to go through this. This training of local pastors and missions leaders will serve those of us who are serving on the field beyond telling, in terms of awareness, help and support. It will make a missions committee more effective in doing it's job and it will give the local church greater global impact.
3. Don't Make Everything "Missions" (because that will make nothing missions)
I know the trends. I know we now use the term "mission" as a generic word for "outreach.” Some churches will use "global" and "local" as descriptive modifiers. However, it seems many churches are confused when it comes to the difference between these two areas. And there is a difference. It is not appropriate to pit local outreach and global missions against each other, or to call one more important than the other. However, I also think we do a disservice to both areas when we equate them with each other. Reaching out to American inner cities or helping hurricane victims on the Gulf coast is good work that churches should be involved with. However, this is not the same thing as connecting with those who are crossing culture to reach an unreached, under-reached or unengaged people group. Churches in America can and should be involved with both. Our terminology is important and people get confused when we equate local outreach to global engagement. These are not the same things. While it may be possible to be engaged globally and not involved locally, this is not a typical problem. In most of my observations the exact opposite issue is a greater problem. More churches than ever are engaged at a local level, and assume that things will care for themselves globally. There’s an incredible disconnect. This is exacerbated when we call local outreach "missions" and pat each other on the back for being "missions-minded", when in reality the church is mostly about locally growing bigger and gives very little thought to the unreached and unengaged peoples of the world. Global missions and local outreach are not the same, and engagement with one does not mean engagement with the other.
4. Get Involved With Relationally Based Strategic Partnerships
This means that your church connects directly with a field, a worker or a field project at a personal and relational level. In other words, the local church actually knows and understands international workers, and their work. Partnership is relationship that moves to a specific way of the local church praying for, resourcing, connecting and communicating with the field. Church members know the overseas work and is able to participate with that work in incredibly tangible ways. The field worker, likewise, knows the church and has connected with the people there. We have partner churches who have paid for and installed computer labs, taught Mongolian girls how to quilt and provided field workers with needed vehicles. Official strategic partnerships connect the church with the field, and the field with the church. I'm a fan. For churches in my denomination, this is can now be accomplished in an official manner at www.cmalliance.org. I can’t tell you how much I am a fan of this model of mobilization. It engages both the church and the field and is a true “win/win” for all involved. (Contact me personally if you want more specifics!)
In the end, missions mobilization requires intentional pastoral involvement and there’s no way around it. Pastor (here I go talking direct again), you have to be globally engaged. Meet with and encourage the missions committee. Take “Perspectives” with them. Partner with a field or a field worker. Bathe and believe in the Bible. It's not enough to talk about local outreach, or even to make random short term trips. Make sure your theology of missions includes the unreached, under-reached and unengaged peoples of the world.
Missions should be in the DNA of the church, but it probably won't be until it's the heart of the pastor.
What other ways can a pastor get more involved with missions? How does your church leadership work to mobilize the people of the church for the Great Commission?